You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of patient and public involvement leads in facilitating feedback: “invisible work”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00209-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elspeth Mathie, Nigel Smeeton, Diane Munday, Graham Rhodes, Helena Wythe, Julia Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 55% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 66% |
| Scientists | 10 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,471,450
of 24,363,506 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#120
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,474
of 401,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,363,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.