You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption of non-nutritive sweeteners by pre-schoolers of the food and environment Chilean cohort (FECHIC) before the implementation of the Chilean food labelling and advertising law
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00583-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolina Venegas Hargous, Marcela Reyes, Lindsey Smith Taillie, Carmen Gloria González, Camila Corvalán |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,477,893
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#756
of 1,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,636
of 404,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.