| Title |
Molecular mechanisms of sex bias differences in COVID-19 mortality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03118-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuchong Li, Mirjana Jerkic, Arthur S. Slutsky, Haibo Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 9% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 77% |
| Scientists | 8 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 174 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 57 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 65 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,197,423
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,001
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,487
of 429,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#47
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.