↓ Skip to main content

What happens after James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships? A qualitative study of contexts, processes and impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 521)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
88 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What happens after James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnerships? A qualitative study of contexts, processes and impacts
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-00210-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Staley, Sally Crowe, Joanna C. Crocker, Mary Madden, Trisha Greenhalgh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#848,563
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#49
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,913
of 431,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.