↓ Skip to main content

Lanthipeptides: chemical synthesis versus in vivo biosynthesis as tools for pharmaceutical production

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lanthipeptides: chemical synthesis versus in vivo biosynthesis as tools for pharmaceutical production
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12934-016-0502-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elvis Legala Ongey, Peter Neubauer

Abstract

Lanthipeptides (also called lantibiotics for those with antibacterial activities) are ribosomally synthesized post-translationally modified peptides having thioether cross-linked amino acids, lanthionines, as a structural element. Lanthipeptides have conceivable potentials to be used as therapeutics, however, the lack of stable, high-yield, well-characterized processes for their sustainable production limit their availability for clinical studies and further pharmaceutical commercialization. Though many reviews have discussed the various techniques that are currently employed to produce lanthipeptides, a direct comparison between these methods to assess industrial applicability has not yet been described. In this review we provide a synoptic comparison of research efforts on total synthesis and in vivo biosynthesis aimed at fostering lanthipeptides production. We further examine current applications and propose measures to enhance product yields. Owing to their elaborate chemical structures, chemical synthesis of these biomolecules is economically less feasible for large-scale applications, and hence biological production seems to be the only realistic alternative.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Other 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 51 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 15%
Chemistry 28 13%
Engineering 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 56 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,288,000
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#149
of 1,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,816
of 341,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.