| Title |
Comparison of hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and standard of care in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: an opportunistic retrospective analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03117-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Lecronier, Alexandra Beurton, Sonia Burrel, Luc Haudebourg, Robin Deleris, Julien Le Marec, Sara Virolle, Safaa Nemlaghi, Côme Bureau, Pierre Mora, Martin De Sarcus, Olivier Clovet, Baptiste Duceau, Paul Henri Grisot, Marie Hélène Pari, Jérémy Arzoine, Ulrich Clarac, David Boutolleau, Mathieu Raux, Julie Delemazure, Morgane Faure, Maxens Decavele, Elise Morawiec, Julien Mayaux, Alexandre Demoule, Martin Dres |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 26% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 160 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 48 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2021.
All research outputs
#558,423
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#361
of 6,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,006
of 431,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.