You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Draft genome sequence of Arthrospira platensis C1 (PCC9438)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Microbiome, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.4056/sigs.2525955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Supapon Cheevadhanarak, Kalyanee Paithoonrangsarid, Peerada Prommeenate, Warunee Kaewngam, Apiluck Musigkain, Somvong Tragoonrung, Satoshi Tabata, Takakazu Kaneko, Jeerayut Chaijaruwanich, Duangjai Sangsrakru, Sithichoke Tangphatsornruang, Juntima Chanprasert, Sissades Tongsima, Kanthida Kusonmano, Wattana Jeamton, Sudarat Dulsawat, Amornpan Klanchui, Tayvich Vorapreeda, Vasunun Chumchua, Chiraphan Khannapho, Chinae Thammarongtham, Vethachai Plengvidhya, Sanjukta Subudhi, Apiradee Hongsthong, Marasri Ruengjitchatchawalya, Asawin Meechai, Jittisak Senachak, Morakot Tanticharoen |
| Abstract |
Arthrospira platensis is a cyanobacterium that is extensively cultivated outdoors on a large commercial scale for consumption as a food for humans and animals. It can be grown in monoculture under highly alkaline conditions, making it attractive for industrial production. Here we describe the complete genome sequence of A. platensis C1 strain and its annotation. The A. platensis C1 genome contains 6,089,210 bp including 6,108 protein-coding genes and 45 RNA genes, and no plasmids. The genome information has been used for further comparative analysis, particularly of metabolic pathways, photosynthetic efficiency and barriers to gene transfer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#193
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,419
of 171,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.