You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00711-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alix Chadwell, Laura Diment, M. Micó-Amigo, Dafne Z. Morgado Ramírez, Alex Dickinson, Malcolm Granat, Laurence Kenney, Sisary Kheng, Mohammad Sobuh, Robert Ssekitoleko, Peter Worsley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 70% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 87 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 56 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 92 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,022,486
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#225
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,950
of 396,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.