@EastClintwood13 @R_A_Ziemkiewicz @DariLeblo @GadowskiWitold Jest nawet mniej niż 0,2: https://t.co/ujo12WMkiu
RT @NickT4000: @phantamagasm @ATInsider @Harrythehorse8 @sarahrimmington @CanAditude Conclusion: A higher than expected percentage of peopl…
@mandakay1008 @BraveNew716 @markpoloncarz @TheBuffaloNews @WKBW @SPECNewsBuffalo @WGRZPolitics @news4buffalo @NewsRadio930 @WBFO @BeeNewspapers @BfloBizFirst @ECDOH Not sure how u interpreted that. Study of Wuhan showed ifr of 0.04-0.12%. There are multi
RT @HelmhotzMarx: @NWJK @nickolasdreyfus @MarkatLangstone Your numbers are nonsensical. Even the WHO is citing 0.65% as the IFR. Better est…
RT @scorthine93: “We also estimated the most recent crude infection fatality ratio (IFR) and time–delay adjusted IFR at 0.04% (95% CrI 0.03…
“We also estimated the most recent crude infection fatality ratio (IFR) and time–delay adjusted IFR at 0.04% (95% CrI 0.03–0.06%) and 0.12% (95% CrI 0.08–0.17%), respectively, estimates that are substantially smaller than the crude CFR estimated at 4.06%.”
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from Kenji Mizumoto and colleagues: Early epidemiological assessment of the #transmission potenti…
RT @BMCMedicine: New #OpenAccess research from Kenji Mizumoto and colleagues: Early epidemiological assessment of the #transmission potenti…
New #OpenAccess research from Kenji Mizumoto and colleagues: Early epidemiological assessment of the #transmission potential and virulence of #coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in #Wuhan City, China, January–February, 2020 Read it here: https://t.co/nY