↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative bridging anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation—the first randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Perioperative Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative bridging anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation—the first randomised controlled trial
Published in
Perioperative Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13741-016-0040-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Matthew Wight, Malachy Oliver Columb

Abstract

Patients who have atrial fibrillation (AF) have increased thromboembolic risk. This risk is mitigated through use of anticoagulants, traditionally with vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, and more recently with drugs such as Xa and thrombin inhibitors. Since anticoagulants increase the risk of bleeding, uncertainty exists regarding their use in the perioperative period. The risk of thromboembolism for each patient must be balanced against risk of bleeding; anticoagulation medication may be continued, replaced with a short-acting alternative or withheld entirely. Until recently, evidence on best management relied on expert opinion and observational studies. The recent publication of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (BRIDGE) has added important information to the knowledge base. BRIDGE ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00786474.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,171,970
of 23,342,232 outputs
Outputs from Perioperative Medicine
#177
of 244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,992
of 342,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perioperative Medicine
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.