↓ Skip to main content

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) cases are not random: explaining trend, low- and high-frequency oscillations based on the Austrian TBE time series

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) cases are not random: explaining trend, low- and high-frequency oscillations based on the Austrian TBE time series
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05156-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franz Rubel, Melanie Walter, Janna R. Vogelgesang, Katharina Brugger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 23%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2020.
All research outputs
#18,734,471
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#5,690
of 7,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,411
of 399,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#104
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.