↓ Skip to main content

Health and aging in elderly farmers: the AMI cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and aging in elderly farmers: the AMI cohort
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-558
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karine Pérès, Fanny Matharan, Michèle Allard, Hélène Amieva, Isabelle Baldi, Pascale Barberger-Gateau, Valérie Bergua, Isabelle Bourdel-Marchasson, Cécile Delcourt, Alexandra Foubert-Samier, Annie Fourrier-Réglat, Maryse Gaimard, Sonia Laberon, Cécilia Maubaret, Virginie Postal, Chantal Chantal, Muriel Rainfray, Nicole Rascle, Jean-François Dartigues

Abstract

The health of the agricultural population has been previously explored, particularly in relation to the farming exposures and among professionally active individuals. However, few studies specifically focused on health and aging among elders retired from agriculture. Yet, this population faces the long-term effects of occupational exposures and multiple difficulties related to living and aging in rural area (limited access to shops, services, and practitioners). However, these difficulties may be counter-balanced by advantages related to healthier lifestyle, richer social support and better living environment. The general aim of the AMI cohort was to study health and aging in elderly farmers living in rural area through a multidisciplinary approach, with a main focus on dementia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Psychology 21 11%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 55 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,252
of 14,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,538
of 164,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#259
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,752 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.