You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting and measuring fluid responsiveness with echocardiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Echo Research & Practice, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1530/erp-16-0008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miller Ashley, Mandeville Justin |
| Abstract |
Echocardiography is an essential tool for guiding resuscitation in critically ill patients. Resuscitation often requires the infusion of intravenous fluid in an effort to reverse organ dysfunction, but the harms of inappropriate use of fluid are becoming increasingly apparent. This article outlines the physiological basis of fluid resuscitation followed by a description of the concept of fluid responsiveness (FR) and how this can be assessed with echocardiography. In addition the limitations and pitfalls are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 16% |
| Mexico | 16 | 12% |
| United States | 10 | 8% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| Singapore | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
| Scientists | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 285 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 14% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 69 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 165 | 57% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 13 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 78 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#515,649
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#5
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,939
of 355,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them