You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08852-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathryn D. Jackson, Colleen R. Higgins, Sarah K. Laing, Chiluba Mwila, Tamaki Kobayashi, Matthew M. Ippolito, Sean Sylvia, Sachiko Ozawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 38 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 39 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,765,134
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,780
of 15,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,878
of 397,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#207
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.