↓ Skip to main content

Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of substandard and falsified antimalarials in Zambia: application of the SAFARI model
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-08852-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn D. Jackson, Colleen R. Higgins, Sarah K. Laing, Chiluba Mwila, Tamaki Kobayashi, Matthew M. Ippolito, Sean Sylvia, Sachiko Ozawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 38 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 39 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2020.
All research outputs
#13,765,134
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,780
of 15,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,878
of 397,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#207
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.