↓ Skip to main content

Management of adrenal incidentaloma: the role of adrenalectomy may be underestimated

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management of adrenal incidentaloma: the role of adrenalectomy may be underestimated
Published in
BMC Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12893-016-0154-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun-lin Ye, Xiao-xu Yuan, Ming-kun Chen, Yu-ping Dai, Zi-ke Qin, Fu-fu Zheng

Abstract

To demonstrate clinical characteristics of adrenal incidentaloma in South China and explore its comprehensive management. The clinical data of patients with adrenal neoplasm from Jan 1998 to Dec 2012 were retrospectively analysed. Patients with suspicion of adrenal abnormalities or those in whom adrenal abnormalities were detected in the staging procedures of other cancers were excluded. Most patients with adrenal incidentaloma chose to have adrenalectomy, and some chose surveillance. The relationships between clinical features were analysed with a chi-square test and rank sum test. In total, 634 patients with adrenal incidentaloma were studied. Their age ranged from 17 to 85 years old with a median age of 50 years. Of 478 cases with pathological results, adenoma was the most common tumour (233/478), with 84 cases of pheochromocytoma and 36 cases of adrenocortical carcinoma were 84 and 36. When the tumour size was ≤4 cm, >95 % were benign; when the tumour size was >6 cm, 33 % were malignant. For patients with a tumour size ≤4 cm, 249/376 cases had an adrenalectomy performed. Due to anxiety over a potential malignant transformation and enlargement, most patients (>80 %) under surveillance preferred to undergo adrenalectomy. Pheochromocytoma and adrenocortical carcinoma were not rare tumours of adrenal incidentaloma, and 4 cm is a good size cutoff to use in the diagnosis of an adrenal incidentaloma. Other than surveillance, laparoscopic adrenalectomy may become the method of choice for management of small adrenal incidentaloma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Mathematics 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#882
of 1,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,079
of 340,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.