You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical and molecular pathology of pancreatic neoplasms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13000-016-0497-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenzel M. Hackeng, Ralph H. Hruban, G. Johan A. Offerhaus, Lodewijk A. A. Brosens |
| Abstract |
Histologic characteristics have proven to be very useful for classifying different types of tumors of the pancreas. As a result, the major tumor types in the pancreas have long been classified based on their microscopic appearance. Recent advances in whole exome sequencing, gene expression profiling, and knowledge of tumorigenic pathways have deepened our understanding of the underlying biology of pancreatic neoplasia. These advances have not only confirmed the traditional histologic classification system, but also opened new doors to early diagnosis and targeted treatment. This review discusses the histopathology, genetic and epigenetic alterations and potential treatment targets of the five major malignant pancreatic tumors - pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, acinar cell carcinoma and pancreatoblastoma. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,318,465
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#136
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,131
of 353,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.