↓ Skip to main content

Genetic risk factors for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in Kazakh population

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic risk factors for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in Kazakh population
Published in
Human Genomics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40246-016-0077-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena V. Zholdybayeva, Yerkebulan A. Talzhanov, Akbota M. Aitkulova, Pavel V. Tarlykov, Gulmira N. Kulmambetova, Aisha N. Iskakova, Aliya U. Dzholdasbekova, Olga A. Visternichan, Dana Zh. Taizhanova, Yerlan M. Ramanculov

Abstract

After coronary stenting, the risk of developing restenosis is from 20 to 35 %. The aim of the present study is to investigate the association of genetic variation in candidate genes in patients diagnosed with restenosis in the Kazakh population. Four hundred fifty-nine patients were recruited to the study; 91 patients were also diagnosed with diabetes and were excluded from the sampling. DNA was extracted with the salting-out method. The patients were genotyped for 53 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Genotyping was performed on the QuantStudio 12K Flex (Life Technologies). Differences in distribution of BMI score among different genotype groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Also, statistical analysis was performed using R and PLINK v.1.07. Haplotype frequencies and LD measures were estimated by using the software Haploview 4.2. A logistic regression analysis found a significant difference in restenosis rates for different genotypes. FGB (rs1800790) is significantly associated with restenosis after stenting (OR = 2.924, P = 2.3E-06, additive model) in the Kazakh population. CD14 (rs2569190) showed a significant association in the additive (OR = 0.08033, P = 2.11E-09) and dominant models (OR = 0.05359, P = 4.15E-11). NOS3 (rs1799983) was also highly associated with development of restenosis after stenting in additive (OR = 20.05, P = 2.74 E-12) and recessive models (OR = 22.24, P = 6.811E-10). Our results indicate that FGB (rs1800790), CD14 (rs2569190), and NOS3 (rs1799983) SNPs could be genetic markers for development of restenosis in Kazakh population. Adjustment for potential confounder factor BMI gave almost the same results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Other 4 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 4 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#389
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,298
of 354,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.