↓ Skip to main content

QALY-time: experts’ view on the use of the quality-adjusted life year in cost-effectiveness analysis in palliative care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
QALY-time: experts’ view on the use of the quality-adjusted life year in cost-effectiveness analysis in palliative care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05521-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B. Wichmann, Lia C. M. J. Goltstein, Ndidi J. Obihara, Madeleine R. Berendsen, M. Van Houdenhoven, R. Sean Morrison, Bridget M. Johnston, Y. Engels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 23 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 24 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#14,124,727
of 24,616,908 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,743
of 8,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,899
of 401,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#129
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,616,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.