↓ Skip to main content

QALY-time: experts’ view on the use of the quality-adjusted life year in cost-effectiveness analysis in palliative care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
QALY-time: experts’ view on the use of the quality-adjusted life year in cost-effectiveness analysis in palliative care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-05521-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne B. Wichmann, Lia C. M. J. Goltstein, Ndidi J. Obihara, Madeleine R. Berendsen, M. Van Houdenhoven, R. Sean Morrison, Bridget M. Johnston, Y. Engels, Madeleine Berendsen, Lia Goltstein, Elze Knol, Melvin Kool, Wytse Nienhuis, Luc Nies, Ndidi Obihara, Jelte Pieksma, Jordy Rovers

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 18%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 11 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,952,416
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,608
of 6,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,673
of 306,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.