You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wells criteria for DVT is a reliable clinical tool to assess the risk of deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Emergency Surgery, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13017-016-0078-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shrey Modi, Ryan Deisler, Karen Gozel, Patty Reicks, Eric Irwin, Melissa Brunsvold, Kaysie Banton, Greg J. Beilman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 13% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 87 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 102 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,565,407
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#150
of 606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,725
of 354,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Emergency Surgery
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.