You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01414-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Allum, Chloe Apps, Nicholas Hart, Natalie Pattison, Bronwen Connolly, Louise Rose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,997,042
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#558
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,003
of 399,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#16
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.