↓ Skip to main content

Tumor volume is more reliable to predict nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer of 3.0 cm or less in the greatest tumor diameter

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumor volume is more reliable to predict nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer of 3.0 cm or less in the greatest tumor diameter
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12957-020-01946-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bei Jia, Biao Chen, Hao Long, Tiehua Rong, Xiaodong Su

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,158,060
of 18,286,759 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,343
of 1,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,526
of 304,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,286,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,634 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them