| Title |
Effect of favipiravir and an anti-inflammatory strategy for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03137-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hitoshi Yamamura, Hiroshi Matsuura, Junichiro Nakagawa, Hiroshi Fukuoka, Hisaya Domi, Satoru Chujoh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 23 | 21% |
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Guatemala | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 68 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 92% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 4% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2022.
All research outputs
#669,302
of 25,840,929 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#449
of 6,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,958
of 431,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,840,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.