You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matteo Bergamaschi, Francesco Tiezzi, Jeremy Howard, Yi Jian Huang, Kent A. Gray, Constantino Schillebeeckx, Nathan P. McNulty, Christian Maltecca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 15 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,924,581
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#769
of 1,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,208
of 399,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,474 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.