You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engagement intervention versus treatment as usual for young adults with serious mental illness: a randomized pilot trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00650-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle R. Munson, James J. Jaccard, Lionel D. Scott, Sarah C. Narendorf, Kiara L. Moore, Nadia Jenefsky, Andrea Cole, Maryann Davis, Todd Gilmer, Rei Shimizu, Kristin Pleines, Kamilyah Cooper, Aaron H. Rodwin, Lindsay Hylek, Angel Amaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 60% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 70% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,149,036
of 25,104,329 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#250
of 1,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,408
of 406,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,104,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.