↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes does not affect outcome in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetes does not affect outcome in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-9-94
Authors

Galo Peralta, M Blanca Sánchez, M Pía Roiz, J Carlos Garrido, Ramón Teira, Fátima Mateos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 55%
Psychology 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,166,263
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,085
of 7,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,056
of 113,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#25
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.