↓ Skip to main content

Clinical review: Fresh frozen plasma in massive bleedings - more questions than answers

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical review: Fresh frozen plasma in massive bleedings - more questions than answers
Published in
Critical Care, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc8205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bartolomeu Nascimento, Jeannie Callum, Gordon Rubenfeld, Joao Baptista Rezende Neto, Yulia Lin, Sandro Rizoli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 158 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Other 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 45 27%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 65%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,818,525
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,087
of 6,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,981
of 178,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#32
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.