↓ Skip to main content

No filters, no fridges: a method for preservation of water samples for eDNA analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 4,268)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
No filters, no fridges: a method for preservation of water samples for eDNA analysis
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13104-016-2104-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly E. Williams, Kathryn P. Huyvaert, Antoinette J. Piaggio

Abstract

Advancements in the detection of environmental DNA (eDNA) for detecting species of interest will likely allow for expanded use of these techniques in the field. One obstacle that continues to hinder applications in the field is the requirement of a cold chain of storage for water samples containing eDNA. While eDNA has been successfully preserved using Longmire's lysis buffer applied to filters, it has yet to be tried with freshwater samples collected for eDNA detection of an invasive species. We tested the utility of Longmire's solution (100 mM Tris, 100 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, 0.5 % SDS, 0.2 % sodium azide) as an additive to freshwater samples for preservation of eDNA. Environmental DNA was effectively preserved in 15 mL water samples with Longmire's solution added; eDNA positive detection was comparable to freezing the samples at -80 °C and occurred out to 56 days at the highest concentration (5 mL Longmire's solution: 15 mL sample water). Medium and low concentrations of Longmire's solution added to 15 mL of sample water generally preserved eDNA out to 56 days but not as well as did freezing or application of the highest concentration of Longmire's lysis buffer. Treatment and degradation time had a significant effect on average DNA concentration of samples, although not the interaction of treatment and time. Perfect detection occurred out to 56 days with the high Longmire's treatment group but DNA concentration was significantly lower at this time point compared to 28 days. We conclude that Longmire's lysis buffer is a viable alternative to cold chain storage that can simplify the collection of eDNA by eliminating the need for filtering and allow more time for sample collection when added at our highest concentration (1 part Longmire's:3 parts water sample), which could translate to an increase in the chances of detecting a rare or elusive species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 318 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 20%
Researcher 60 19%
Student > Master 57 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Other 17 5%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 63 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 18%
Environmental Science 54 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 70 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#79,392
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#6
of 4,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,875
of 340,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.