↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric testing of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group—Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) subscale in a longitudinal study of cancer patients treated with…

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychometric testing of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group—Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) subscale in a longitudinal study of cancer patients treated with chemotherapy
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12955-020-01493-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Lin Cheng, Violeta Lopez, Simon Ching Lam, Anthony Kwun To Leung, Yu Chung Li, Kam Hung Wong, Joseph Siu Kie Au, Raghav Sundar, Alexandre Chan, Terrence Rong De Ng, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen, Choi Wan Chan, Janelle Yorke, Alex Molassiotis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 28 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Psychology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 29 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2020.
All research outputs
#20,631,102
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#2,007
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,105
of 399,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#66
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.