You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Planning influenza vaccination programs: a cost benefit model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-10-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian G Duncan, Michael S Taitel, Junjie Zhang, Heather S Kirkham |
| Abstract |
Although annual influenza vaccination could decrease the significant economic and humanistic burden of influenza in the United States, immunization rates are below recommended levels, and concerns remain whether immunization programs can be cost beneficial. The research objective was to compare cost benefit of various immunization strategies from employer, employee, and societal perspectives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 27% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,731,378
of 25,331,507 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#167
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,439
of 170,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,331,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.