You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does the effect of gender modify the relationship between deprivation and mortality?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-574 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natalia Salcedo, Marc Saez, Basili Bragulat, Carme Saurina |
Abstract |
In this study we propose improvements to the method of elaborating deprivation indexes. First, in the selection of the variables, we incorporated a wider range of both objective and subjective measures. Second, in the statistical methodology, we used a distance indicator instead of the standard aggregating method principal component analysis. Third, we propose another methodological improvement, which consists in the use of a more robust statistical method to assess the relationship between deprivation and health responses in ecological regressions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Ireland | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 18% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#5,755,051
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#5,694
of 15,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,717
of 165,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#100
of 345 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 345 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.