↓ Skip to main content

Artemisinin resistance containment project in Thailand. (I): Implementation of electronic-based malaria information system for early case detection and individual case management in provinces along…

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artemisinin resistance containment project in Thailand. (I): Implementation of electronic-based malaria information system for early case detection and individual case management in provinces along the Thai-Cambodian border
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amnat Khamsiriwatchara, Prayuth Sudathip, Surasak Sawang, Saowanit Vijakadge, Thanapon Potithavoranan, Aumnuyphan Sangvichean, Wichai Satimai, Charles Delacollette, Pratap Singhasivanon, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Jaranit Kaewkungwal

Abstract

The Bureau of Vector-borne Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand, has implemented an electronic Malaria Information System (eMIS) as part of a strategy to contain artemisinin resistance. The attempt corresponds to the WHO initiative, funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to contain anti-malarial drug resistance in Southeast Asia. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate the eMIS' functionality and outputs after implementation for use in the Thailand artemisinin-resistance containment project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 25%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Computer Science 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,412,837
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,017
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,997
of 168,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#24
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.