You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, July 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00504-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
R. Broekstra, E. L. M. Maeckelberghe, J. L. Aris-Meijer, R. P. Stolk, S. Otten |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Austria | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 20% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,342,539
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#611
of 1,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,521
of 398,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.