You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cardiac output and cardiac index measured with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects, elite athletes and patients with congestive heart failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-51 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus Carlsson, Ruslana Andersson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Henrik Mosén, Freddy Stahlberg, Bjorn Ekmehag, Hakan Arheden |
Abstract |
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) enables non-invasive quantification of cardiac output (CO) and thereby cardiac index (CI, CO indexed to body surface area). The aim of this study was to establish if CI decreases with age and compare the values to CI for athletes and for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 151 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 15% |
Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 15% |
Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 42% |
Engineering | 17 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 43 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,032,385
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,062
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,257
of 179,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.