You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduction of claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: methods and design of the "CLAUSTRO" randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Imaging, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2342-11-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith Enders, Elke Zimmermann, Matthias Rief, Peter Martus, Randolf Klingebiel, Patrick Asbach, Christian Klessen, Gerd Diederichs, Thomas Bengner, Ulf Teichgräber, Bernd Hamm, Marc Dewey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 72 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 11% |
| Psychology | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 76 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,167,373
of 23,223,705 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#135
of 612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,527
of 185,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,223,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.