| Title |
Incidence and mortality of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03175-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu-Chen Liao, Shih-Chieh Shao, Yih-Ting Chen, Yung-Chang Chen, Ming-Jui Hung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,831,950
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,612
of 6,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,737
of 429,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#63
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.