You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do knowledge, knowledge sources and reasoning skills affect the accuracy of nursing diagnoses? a randomised study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6955-11-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wolter Paans, Walter Sermeus, Roos MB Nieweg, Wim P Krijnen, Cees P van der Schans |
| Abstract |
This paper reports a study about the effect of knowledge sources, such as handbooks, an assessment format and a predefined record structure for diagnostic documentation, as well as the influence of knowledge, disposition toward critical thinking and reasoning skills, on the accuracy of nursing diagnoses.Knowledge sources can support nurses in deriving diagnoses. A nurse's disposition toward critical thinking and reasoning skills is also thought to influence the accuracy of his or her nursing diagnoses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 27% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2012.
All research outputs
#15,248,503
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#448
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,546
of 164,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.