You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Therapeutic electric stimulation does not affect immune status in healthy individuals – a preliminary report
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-11-42 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreja N Kopitar, Vladimir Kotnik, Gaj Vidmar, Alojz Ihan, Primoz Novak, Martin Stefancic |
Abstract |
Neuromuscular electric stimulation is widely used for muscle strengthening in clinical practice and for preventative purposes. However, there are few reports on the effects of electric stimulation on the immune response of the organism, and even those mainly describe the changes observed immediately after the electrotherapeutic procedures. The objective of our study was to examine the possible immunological consequences of moderate low-frequency transcutaneous neuromuscular electric stimulation for quadriceps muscle strengthening in healthy individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Mexico | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Professor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 9% |
Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,248,503
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#424
of 821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,396
of 164,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 821 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.