You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Innovative solutions to enhance safe and green environments for ageing well using co-design through patient and public involvement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00223-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna L. Hatton, Catherine Haslam, Sarah Bell, Joe Langley, Ryan Woolrych, Corrina Cory, James M. W. Brownjohn, Victoria A. Goodwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 67% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Design | 7 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 45 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,653,301
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#229
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,383
of 428,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.