↓ Skip to main content

A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing standard wound care with adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to standard wound care only for the treatment of…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing standard wound care with adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to standard wound care only for the treatment of chronic, non-healing ulcers of the lower limb in patients with diabetes mellitus: a study protocol
Published in
Trials, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-69
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daria O'Reilly, Ron Linden, Ludwik Fedorko, Jean-Eric Tarride, Wilhelmine Giffening Jones, James M Bowen, Ron Goeree

Abstract

It has been suggested that the use of adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy improves the healing of diabetic foot ulcers, and decreases the risk of lower extremity amputations. A limited number of studies have used a double blind approach to evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic ulcers. The primary aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy plus standard wound care compared with standard wound care alone in preventing the need for major amputation in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic ulcers of the lower limb.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Researcher 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 13 6%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 54 27%