You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of an online interactive Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) versus online self-directed learning: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Schroter, Richard D Jenkins, Rebecca A Playle, Kieran M Walsh, Courtenay Probert, Thomas Kellner, Gerhard Arnhofer, David R Owens |
| Abstract |
Methods for the dissemination, understanding and implementation of clinical guidelines need to be examined for their effectiveness to help doctors integrate guidelines into practice. The objective of this randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive online Diabetes Needs Assessment Tool (DNAT) (which constructs an e-learning curriculum based on individually identified knowledge gaps), compared with self-directed e-learning of diabetes guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Librarian | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,604,147
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,114
of 3,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,777
of 100,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.