↓ Skip to main content

Usefulness of a biomarker to identify placental dysfunction in the context of malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usefulness of a biomarker to identify placental dysfunction in the context of malaria
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1664-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Gueneuc, Philippe Deloron, Gwladys I. Bertin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,618,361
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,487
of 5,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,227
of 422,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#47
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.