↓ Skip to main content

eHealth technologies assisting in identifying potential adverse interactions with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) or standalone CAM adverse events or side effects: a scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
eHealth technologies assisting in identifying potential adverse interactions with complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) or standalone CAM adverse events or side effects: a scoping review
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12906-020-02963-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeremy Y. Ng, Maryam Mooghali, Vanessa Munford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 8%
Unspecified 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 26 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,191,899
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,290
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,998
of 427,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.