You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multi-view secondary input collaborative deep learning for lung nodule 3D segmentation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Imaging, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40644-020-00331-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xianling Dong, Shiqi Xu, Yanli Liu, Aihui Wang, M. Iqbal Saripan, Li Li, Xiaolei Zhang, Lijun Lu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 12 | 19% |
| Engineering | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 31 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#19,957,118
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#393
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,338
of 426,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.