↓ Skip to main content

Medicinal ethnobotany in Huacareta (Chuquisaca, Bolivia)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medicinal ethnobotany in Huacareta (Chuquisaca, Bolivia)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-8-29
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Quiroga, Lidia Meneses, Rainer W Bussmann

Abstract

The aim of this study was to document the types of diseases treated by the use of medicinal plants, their main applications and also to have a report of the major diseases treated at the Hospital of San Pablo de Huacareta (Chuquisaca Bolivia).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 98 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 17%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Other 7 7%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Chemistry 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2017.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#536
of 761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,991
of 167,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.