You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a program theory for clinical pathways in hospitals: protocol for a realist review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1046-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adegboyega K. Lawal, Gary Groot, Donna Goodridge, Shannon Scott, Leigh Kinsman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,620,220
of 23,225,652 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,607
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,328
of 353,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#49
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,225,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.