| Title |
Fruit bats in flight: a look into the movements of the ecologically important Eidolon helvum in Tanzania
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
One Health Outlook, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42522-020-00020-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nistara Randhawa, Brian H. Bird, Elizabeth VanWormer, Zikankuba Sijali, Christopher Kilonzo, Alphonce Msigwa, Abel B. Ekiri, Aziza Samson, Jonathan H. Epstein, David J. Wolking, Woutrina A. Smith, Beatriz Martínez-López, Rudovick Kazwala, Jonna A. K. Mazet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Poland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 73% |
| Scientists | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#987,371
of 23,590,588 outputs
Outputs from One Health Outlook
#9
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,268
of 400,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from One Health Outlook
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,590,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them