You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comprehensive framework for considering additional unintended consequences in economic evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00218-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liv Nymark, Anna Vassall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 25% |
| Malawi | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Librarian | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,120,927
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#71
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,001
of 398,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.