You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effects of tea extracts on proinflammatory signaling
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, December 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-4-28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frank Pajonk, Anja Riedisser, Michael Henke, William H McBride, Bernd Fiebich |
Abstract |
Skin toxicity is a common side effect of radiotherapy for solid tumors. Its management can cause treatment gaps and thus can impair cancer treatment. At present, in many countries no standard recommendation for treatment of skin during radiotherapy exists. In this study, we explored the effect of topically-applied tea extracts on the duration of radiation-induced skin toxicity. We investigated the underlying molecular mechanisms and compared effects of tea extracts with the effects of epigallocatechin-gallate, the proposed most-active moiety of green tea. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 11 | 28% |
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,118,386
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#788
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,988
of 155,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them