↓ Skip to main content

Network and biosignature analysis for the integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic data to characterize leaf senescence process in sunflower

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Network and biosignature analysis for the integration of transcriptomic and metabolomic data to characterize leaf senescence process in sunflower
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-1045-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastián Moschen, Janet Higgins, Julio A. Di Rienzo, Ruth A. Heinz, Norma Paniego, Paula Fernandez

Abstract

In recent years, high throughput technologies have led to an increase of datasets from omics disciplines allowing the understanding of the complex regulatory networks associated with biological processes. Leaf senescence is a complex mechanism controlled by multiple genetic and environmental variables, which has a strong impact on crop yield. Transcription factors (TFs) are key proteins in the regulation of gene expression, regulating different signaling pathways; their function is crucial for triggering and/or regulating different aspects of the leaf senescence process. The study of TF interactions and their integration with metabolic profiles under different developmental conditions, especially for a non-model organism such as sunflower, will open new insights into the details of gene regulation of leaf senescence. Weighted Gene Correlation Network Analysis (WGCNA) and BioSignature Discoverer (BioSD, Gnosis Data Analysis, Heraklion, Greece) were used to integrate transcriptomic and metabolomic data. WGCNA allowed the detection of 10 metabolites and 13 TFs whereas BioSD allowed the detection of 1 metabolite and 6 TFs as potential biomarkers. The comparative analysis demonstrated that three transcription factors were detected through both methodologies, highlighting them as potentially robust biomarkers associated with leaf senescence in sunflower. The complementary use of network and BioSignature Discoverer analysis of transcriptomic and metabolomic data provided a useful tool for identifying candidate genes and metabolites which may have a role during the triggering and development of the leaf senescence process. The WGCNA tool allowed us to design and test a hypothetical network in order to infer relationships across selected transcription factor and metabolite candidate biomarkers involved in leaf senescence, whereas BioSignature Discoverer selected transcripts and metabolites which discriminate between different ages of sunflower plants. The methodology presented here would help to elucidate and predict novel networks and potential biomarkers of leaf senescence in sunflower.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 17%
Engineering 3 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,960,084
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,796
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,094
of 340,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#45
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.