You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-54 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chirine Parsai, Rory O’Hanlon, Sanjay K Prasad, Raad H Mohiaddin |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) is recognised as a valuable clinical tool which in a single scan setting can assess ventricular volumes and function, myocardial fibrosis, iron loading, flow quantification, tissue characterisation and myocardial perfusion imaging. The advent of CMR using extrinsic and intrinsic contrast-enhanced protocols for tissue characterisation have dramatically changed the non-invasive work-up of patients with suspected or known cardiomyopathy. Although the technique initially focused on the in vivo identification of myocardial necrosis through the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique, recent work highlighted the ability of CMR to provide more detailed in vivo tissue characterisation to help establish a differential diagnosis of the underlying aetiology, to exclude an ischaemic substrate and to provide important prognostic markers. The potential application of CMR in the clinical approach of a patient with suspected non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy is discussed in this review. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 62% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,967,134
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,061
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,421
of 179,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.